CasusLegalHigher-court case-law corpus
← Home
Launch · partnership project with M-Logos
CasusLegal, together with M-Logos, is launching “Glossa AI”: a connector that connects your AI assistant to the article-by-article commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in the “Glossa” series edited by A. G. Karapetov. Twelve volumes, covering more than five hundred Code articles.
A connector is a bridge between the model and the book corpus. The assistant answers based not on what it memorised during training, but on the text of the volume: with a verbatim quotation and a link to the page of the edition.
A draft claim, response, or opinion can be checked against the doctrine: “Glossa AI” finds both what supports your argument and what contradicts it. The latter is usually more valuable—it is the opposing party’s position, read in advance.
The quotation is verified, not paraphrased
The text in quotation marks is checked character by character against the book corpus, with a link to the page of the edition. A quotation from the answer can therefore be transferred into a procedural document rather than rechecked against the printed volume.
A printed volume has a limit: it ends with the year in which it was sent to press. That limit is removed here. Case law issued after publication of the volume is linked to the commentary points, with an indication of whether it confirms the book’s conclusion, changes it, or introduces a new approach.
Access to recent court decisions is provided by the CasusLegal database, so the evolution of a legal position can be seen in full: from the commentary to the latest ruling. More than eleven thousand references to decisions of the highest courts have been extracted from the book text and linked to the database—including Plenum resolutions, reviews, information letters, Presidium resolutions of the Supreme Commercial Court, rulings of Supreme Court chambers, and Constitutional Court decisions.
Separately, there are two skills—ready-made workflows. You can view, download, and use them.
Doctrinal review of a text
Your draft claim, response, or opinion is broken down into propositions, and each is checked against the commentary: what the book supports, what it disputes, and what it does not address.
Review of a court decision
The reasoning of another party’s decision is compared with the doctrine in the commentary and with case law issued after publication of the volume, with any discrepancies identified.
How to get started
Simply register at glossa-ai.ru and connect the connector according to the instructions. The skills and usage examples are available there as well.
Feedback submitted during the test mode will determine what the service becomes next.
“Glossa AI” is a joint project of CasusLegal and M-Logos. Commentaries in the “Glossa” series edited by A. G. Karapetov are quoted verbatim from the publication corpus, with a link to the page. Case law is drawn from the CasusLegal database. This material is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice.